Posts Tagged ‘satan’

Whether the complaint made against Lazarus, FIR filed etc., have been stage-managed or really meant for persecuting the rabble riser evangelist who abused and even blasphemed!

November 23, 2019

Whether the complaint made against Lazarus, FIR filed etc., have been stage-managed or really meant for persecuting the rabble riser evangelist who abused and even blasphemed!

Lazarus calling temple as a place of satan The Hindu

Complaint registered based on video circulated in the Social media: Mohan C. Lazarus has been notorious for making anti-Hindu comments during his evangelization discourses. Though, he reportedly makes such tirade in his church, the videos have been in circulation. Evidently, he has contacts with the politicians, as he used to claim and declare that so and so has been Christian, or become Christians, soon he would declare so in the public. About Vaiko, he made such comments. In the same tone and tenor, he was seen declaring that the Hindu gods are satan and so on. Thus, the Hindus, after watching the videos started registering their protest and urging to take legal action against such rabble-rouser. According, the Hindu organizations have lodged complaints with police stations. The case was registered after a video of Mohan preaching went viral on social media[1]. In the video, Mohan, while referring to temples in South India, says[2], “Tamil Nadu has the most number of temples in India. These temples are in the grasp of Satan. The temples in Kumbakonam district are the habitat of devils.”

Lazarus petion filed dismissed- Indian Express

High Court ordered for providing details about the speech made, the place, date etc: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday 10-10-2018, directed the Nagercoil police not to file a charge sheet against evangelist Mohan C. Lazarus until further orders after it was established that the FIR registered against him for his remarks against Hindu gods carried no particulars of place, time or date of the alleged occurrence[3]. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, hearing the plea of Mohan Lazarus, who sought to quash the complaint filed against him, questioned if a case could be booked under Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings) after it was alleged that the speech was made in a closed event[4]. The court sought an explanation to ascertain the facts of the event. Immediately, the police and the applicants should have submitted the details to the court, but, obviously, they did not do that. So actually, one cannot divine who helped him or gave room for such lacuna, so that the petitions could be quashed easily.

G K Ilanthiraiyan dismissed the petition against Mohan Lazarus

The media played hype role, instead of pointing out the lacuna: However, the media had been gleefully carried on the news that more complaints were made against the evangelist and so on. The action was taken against him based on three separate complaints lodged against him with three different police stations[5]. In the first instance, BJP functionary R Jaihind Murugesan, 43, of Uthupalayam near Arasur, lodged a complaint against the preacher with the Sulur police[6]. Based on the complaint, Sulur police inspector Thangaraj registered a first information report (FIR) against Mohan C Lazarus under Sections 153 (A) (1) (a) (b) and 295 (A) of the Indian Penal Code[7]. Likewise, the Karumathampatti police registered a case against the Christian preacher under Sections 153 (A) and 295 (A) of the Indian Penal Code based on a complaint lodged by another BJP functionary, whose identity couldn’t be ascertained[8]. In another instance, VHP district deputy secretary R Manoshankar, 35, of Pollachi, lodged a complaint against Mohan Lazarus with the Pollachi west police, who registered a case[9]. Further investigation is on[10].

Lazarus - Judge Anand Venkatesh

How the court gave hint that the speech made in public should be taken cognizance and so on: Justice N Anand Venkatesh[11], while hearing the petition filed by Lazarus seeking to quash the FIR registered based on a complaint by Hindu Munnani functionary Namburajan, observed that, “Any complaint must have certain preliminary requirements to make out an offence. However, the complaint, in this case, does not satisfy the requirements to attract section 295 (A) of IPC (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious beliefs).” He stated that in order to make out a cognizable offence under the above IPC section, the statement should have been made in a public meeting[12]. If the said statement had been uttered in a closed gathering in the nature of a private meeting, it cannot be cited as a cognizable offence under the above section, as the same would imply that no two persons can freely express their ideas or sentiments to each other in fear that they may be punished if it gets published in social media, the judge added. Criticising the Kottar police for filing FIR on a complaint that lacks the most important details as to where, when and on what occasion the alleged statement had been made, the judge directed the police to explain on what basis the FIR was registered by them.

Difference among the IPC sections

Details of IPC Sections 153A, 295 & 295A SECTION 153 A: The purpose of the Section 153 A is to punish persons who indulge in wanton vilification or attacks upon the religion, race, place of birth, residence, language etc of any particular group or class or upon the founders and prophets of a religion. The jurisdiction of this Section is widened so as to make promotion of disharmony, enmity or feelings of hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities punishable. Offence on moral turpitude is also covered in this section. The offence is a cognizable offence and the punishment for the same may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. However, the punishment of the offence committed in a place of worship is enhanced up to five years and fine.

Ingredients of Section 153A:

  • The act of promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste, community or any other group.
  • Acts prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different groups or castes or communities, if the acts disturb public tranquillity.
  • Acts causing fear or alarm or a feeling of insecurity among members of any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community by use of criminal force or violence against them.

IPC and cyberlaw, Defamation law, effects

SECTION 295: Section 295 of the I.P.C makes destruction, damage, or defilement of a place of worship or an object held sacred, with intent to insult the religion of a class of persons, punishable with imprisonment which may extend to two years, or with fine , or with both. This section has been enacted to compel people to respect the religious susceptibilities of persons of different religious persuasion or creeds.

Ingredients of Section 295:

  • The accused must do such an act with the intention of insulting the religion of any person, or with the knowledge that any class of person is likely to consider such destruction, damage or defilement as an insult to their religion.
  • The accused must destroy, damage or defile any place of worship or any object which is held as sacred by any class of persons.

 SECTION 295-A: The object of Section 295-A is to punish deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or the religious beliefs. This section only punishes an aggravated form of insult to religion when it is perpetrated with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of a class.

Ingredients of Section 295-A:

  • The accused must insult or attempt to insult the religion or religious beliefs of any class of citizens of India.
  • The said insult must be with a deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of the said class of citizens.
  • The said insult must be by words, either spoken or written, by signs or by visible representation or otherwise.
  • The offence under Section 295-A is cognizable and a non-bailable and non-compoundable offence.
  • The police have a power under to arrest a person charged under Section 295-A without a warrant.

However, the police did not arrest him.

IPC and cyberlaw

Lazarus gave a clarification that he made such speech in a pastors conference in 2014: Lazarus, in his petition, said the case of the prosecution was that he had spoken against Hindu gods and referred to them as Satan. He claimed that he did not intend to hurt anyone and the complaint was based on a speech delivered in 2014 at a pastors’ meet in Chennai, which was a closed event. Therefore, how and why the rel hate-speech made in 2014 in Chennai was not noticed and suddenly, it was circulated in 2019 is not known. As it was a private and closed event, as claimed and submitted before the court, how the video suddenly came out in 2014. The source could have been known to him or the persons involved in taking video or the church. As without which, it could not have been made available in Cyberspace. So if at all, anybody wanted to create trouble between two communities, it was the person who uploaded the video first in the internet. Even if it was done for publicity, then, Lazarus is responsible. Thus, instead of investigating in that way, the complaint made, FIR registered etc., were done mechanically, without application of mind or understand the legal provisions.

Mohan Lazarus clarification-1

Mohan Lazarus tactfully clarified that he was talking in a pastors meeting, according to his belief in a closed hall

Mohan Lazarus clarification-2

Mohan Lazarus tactfully clarified that he was talking in a pastors meeting, according to his belief in a closed hall

Lazarus petion filed dismissed- The Hindu

The petition has been dismissed with the provision of appeal: The Nagercoil police had booked him based on a complaint filed by Nambirajan of the Hindu Munnani under Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups) and Section 295A of the IPC. Hearing in the case has been adjourned to October 24, 2018. Lazarus filed a petition explaining his stand and requesting to quash the FIR and further proceedings[13]. Accordingly, Judge G. K. Ilanthiraiyan allowed the petition filed by him and quashed the FIR filed by the Nagerkoil police[14]. The police has to file the closure of complaint to the applicant and the applicant, if has any grievance, he could approach appropriate court for getting redressal. Earlier, Lazarus also explained his position through a video uploaded as a clarification against the accusations made against him[15]. The whole affair exposed as to how the Hindutw forces have badly handled the case and cut a sorrow figure before the public, in spite of having contingent of lawyers and advocates.

© Vedaprakash

23-11-2019.

Lazarus petion filed dismissed- The Dinamalar

[1] India Today, Christian preacher booked for promoting enmity after video goes viral on social media, Lokpria Vasudevan , Chennai, October 3, 2018; UPDATED: October 3, 2018 18:02 IST

[2] https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/christian-preacher-booked-for-promoting-enmity-after-video-goes-viral-on-social-media-1354822-2018-10-03

[3] The Hindu, Explain basis for registering case against evangelist: HC Says FIR against Lazarus lacks details, STAFF REPORTER, MADURAI, OCTOBER 10, 2018 01:03 IST, UPDATED: OCTOBER 10, 2018 01:03 IST

[4] https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/explain-basis-for-registering-case-against-evangelist-hc/article25173085.ece

[5] Times of India, Hate speech: Christian preacher booked in Coimbatore, TNN | Updated: Oct 3, 2018, 10:59 IST

[6] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/coimbatore/hate-speech-christian-preacher-booked/articleshow/66046126.cms

[7] TheNewsMinute, 3 cases against evangelist Mohan C Lazarus for ‘promoting enmity between religions’, Priyanka Thirumurthy, Wednesday, October 03, 2018 – 16:18.

[8] https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/3-cases-against-evangelist-mohan-c-lazarus-promoting-enmity-between-religions-89391

[9] The Hindu, More cases filed against evangelist Mohan Lazarus for his remarks against Hindu deities, Madurai bureau, IRUNELVELI, OCTOBER 03, 2018 19:28 IST; UPDATED: OCTOBER 04, 2018 01:36 IST.

[10] https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/case-filed-against-evangelist/article25114037.ece

[11] Indian Express, Madurai Bench slams Nagercoil police for registering FIR with

insufficient details, Published: 10th October 2018 09:30 AM | Last Updated: 10th October 2018 09:30 AM.

[12] https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2018/oct/10/madurai-bench-slams-nagercoil-police-for-registering-fir-with-insufficient-details-1883461.html

[13] The Hindu, HC quashes FIR against Mohan Lazarus, STAFF REPORTERNOVEMBER 22, 2019 21:32 IST, UPDATED: NOVEMBER 22, 2019 21:32 IST.

[14] https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/hc-quashes-fir-against-mohan-lazarus-madurai-nagercoil/article30053507.ece

[15] https://persecutionrelief.org/pr-mohan-c-lazarus-clarifies-about-the-allegation-made-against-him-by-religious-fanatics/

Four years daughter was sacrificed by devout Muslim to appease Allah on Ramzan in Secular India!

June 11, 2018

Four years daughter was sacrificed by devout Muslim to appease Allah on Ramzan in Secular India!

Qureshi sacrificed Riswana-English-TOI

Secular Indians are exposed with the Christian and Mohammedans mournings and celebrations: Till 1980s, Indians of secular or of other nature did not know much about the mourning or celebrations of Mohammedan and Christian festivals and remembrances. Many times, innocent Indian used to think that “Good Friday” is a very good and auspicious day to celebrate and enjoy. But, slowly, they come to know that it is a day of mourning, as the Christian God was reportedly crucified and died on the crosss. Ramzan draws attention nowadays, because of media coverage and secular appeasement in India. Even if 12% Mohammedans in India celebrate or do not celebrate, according to their belief-system (as some events are to be mourned and no celebrated), holidays would be declared and media dump all sorts of narratives selected and thrusted on the 88% of the rest of India. In India, generally, celebrations, festivals and commemorations would be of merriment nature and not of mourning, grief and bereavement. In fact, even “Naraka caturti” is celebrated and not mourned. Under such circumstances, about Ramzan, much fuss is made. In Jammu and Kashmir context, “Ramzan ceasefire” is talked about, though, daily, jihadis kill people and get killed without any remorse. Perhaps, they do not have any Ramzan or fasting. Or they serve Allah by killing humanbeings or kafirs or Mohammedans themselves on one or the other pretext. Thus, the news of throat slitting of four years daughter by a devout Muslim father haunts and daunts Indians now.

Father sacrificed daughter - jephthah -06-06-2018

Jephthah’s sacrifice of his daughter stands in stark contrast to the Binding of Isaac in the Book of Genesis, in which Abraham was about to perform a divinely-ordered sacrifice of his son, when an angel of God directly intervened and stopped the sacrifice. So, it has to be decided by the believers to suit the theology.

Father sacrificed daughter 06-06-2018

Gruesome throat slitting of four years baby – girl child: Jodhpur Rural police on Saturday 09-06-2018, arrested a 26-year-old man, a resident of Silawaton Ka Mohalla for allegedly murdering his four-year-old daughter, a day after she was found dead at their home[1]. Nawab Ali Qureshi’s daughter Rizwana was sleeping with her parents and an 11-month-old sister on Thursday night, when she was found murdered[2]. The family, which lives in Pipar City, approached the police with Qureshi’s wife Shabana (22) submitting a complaint[3] about her gruesome killing. Considering the “sensitivities, and heinousness of the crime”, Jodhpur Rural SP Rajan Dushyant constituted multiple teams to probe the case, while teams from Forensic Science Laboratory and dog squads were also brought in[4]. In a secular India, nowadays, everytjing is interpreted differently, according to one’s convenience or ideology. “Investigation revealed the suspicious role of the father. His psychological questioning helped reveal clues. Ultimately, he confessed to his crime,” the police said in a statement.

Ramadan ceasefire - 2018

The father-killers confessed that Satan / devil possessed him and he sacrificed his daughter: The SP quoted Qureshi as saying, “Jo meri sabse pyaari cheez thi wo Allah ke paas bhejni thi (I had to offer my most prized possession to Allah).” As per Islam, the month of Ramzan is observed to practice tolerance and selflessness. Qureshi told the police that he believed the devil had entered him / Satan had taken over him[5]. India Today noted[6], “He also said that now he is in a state of shock and feels as if Satan had overtaken him when he murdered his daughter. If he were to be believed, the devil got it done and not him.” In resemblance of sacrificing a goat on Bakrid, a man slit throat of his four-year-old daughter to please Allah during Ramzan[7]. “I am a devout Muslim and love my daughter more than my life. For several days she was at her grandmother’s place and returned on Thursday. I took her to the marketplace and bought sweetmeats and fruits. In the night I took her to the courtyard downstairs, recited a kalima, killed her, and then went back to sleep upstairs,” Qureshi told the police[8]. Rizwana’s post-mortem and burial took place on Friday, 08-06-2018[9]. So the PTI news[10] is repeated by other English print and electronic media that “to appease Allah,” the sacrifice was carried on! So no secular Indian can have any right to condemn or criticize.

J K do not bother ceasefire

How can secular Indians understad that Allah can be pleased by killing four years daughter?: So far, secular Indians have been witnessing how camels, cattle and other animals and fouls are sacrificed during the “Bakrid.” No “Blue cross,” PETA or any animal loving agencies, groups or individuals comment upon r criticize such killings with blood flowing on the roads. Some times, news would be there like, the meat shops would be closed on “Mahaveer Jayanti”! That is by one day closure, all have been made to believe that all meat-eaters respect on the rest 364 bdays. An ironically, nowadays, all types flesh eaters participate and even lecture in non-violence, vegetarian and other “Jeevakarunya” type meetings, seminars and conferences. On the worst side, NV food is also served on such occasions. Many times, intellectuals and ideologists claim that “The sin of killing (of anything) is neutralized by eating it (its flesh)”

© Vedaprakash

11-06-2018

Father sacrificed daughter - jephthah -06-06-2018-2.jpg

[1] Times of India, Jodhpur man ‘sacrifices’ daughter to please God, TNN | Updated: Jun 10, 2018, 16:45 IST.

[2] https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jodhpur/jodhpur-man-sacrifices-daughter-to-please-god/articleshow/64525437.cms

[3] Indian Express, Jodhpur man held for killing four-year-old daughter ‘to please Allah’, Written by Hamza Khan | Jaipur | Updated: June 10, 2018 2:47:33 pm.

[4] http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jodhpur-man-held-for-killing-four-year-old-daughter-5211282/

[5] Siasat.com, Jodhpur: Father sacrifice 4-year-old daughter to ‘appease Allah during Ramzan’, arrested, June 10, 2018, 11:21 AM IST.

[6] India Today, Man slits 4-year-old daughter’s throat as sacrifice to Allah, Rohit Parihar, Jaipur, June 10, 2018UPDATED: June 10, 2018 03:59 IST

[7] https://www.indiatoday.in/crime/story/jodhpur-rajasthan-father-slits-daughter-throat-ramzan-human-sacrifice-1256365-2018-06-10

[8] https://www.siasat.com/news/jodhpur-father-sacrifice-4-year-old-daughter-appease-allah-during-ramzan-arrested-1367122/

[9] NDTV, Rajasthan Man Allegedly Kills Daughter To “Appease Allah”, Goes Off To Sleep, All India | Press Trust of India | Updated: June 10, 2018 10:34 IST.

[10] https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/rajasthan-man-arrested-for-sacrificing-daughter-for-ramzan-police-1865056